Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 April 1

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PeterSymonds (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An IP has stated that the image is not for commercial use, which could mean that the IP actually holds the copyright and has published it under an invalid license, or it could just be vandalism. Ipatrol (talk) 00:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - this is my own image; my intention was to upload with a CC Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 license, but I did so with the wrong kind of license as I was not familiar with CC terminology. This is why I added the non-commercial statement, though clearly, the method of doing so creates issues such as this one. How best to resolve? Many thanks for your patience and assistance! Attenboroughii (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing you can do is to scrap the image and release it again under a license that allows commercial use (we won't accept it otherwise). I will have it deleted as per F3 now, just reload a new version under CC-BY-SA.--Ipatrol (talk) 22:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant screenshot of copyrighted software/map. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 06:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - screenshots of Google Maps are non-free. -kotra (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant screenshot of copyrighted software/map. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 06:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Screenshots of Google Maps are non-free. -kotra (talk) 16:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, tagged as non-free. (There are still many issues though.). – Quadell ^(talk) 19:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although the screenshot would come under fair-use, this image was published in a magazine as well – does that not affect the fair use policy? If so, I can easily upload a fair-use replacement. Cycle~ (talk) 12:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. source of the image. I hope we can keep this particular image, for the Max article as it shows a professional musician's example of usage, and for the Autechre article as it would be hard to replace. I can email the magazine, if someone can tell me what permissions are needed in this specific case. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 17:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No source provided Tomdobb (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No source provided Tomdobb (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No source provided Tomdobb (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No source provided Tomdobb (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No source provided Tomdobb (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No source provided Tomdobb (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted DVD cover, unlikely uploader is copyright holder. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 17:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contains multiple unfree logos. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 19:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I can remove the Total Commander icon from the image since it's the only one that doesn't come from an open source application. Would that do it? Thanks. Laurent (talk) 19:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Open source != logo is free. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 21:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I see what you mean. Ok the picture can be deleted then. I'm going to create another one with only free icons. Thanks. Laurent (talk) 21:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Geni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This signature is a derivative work which was created before this image was uploaded, likely copyvio. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 21:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK this image is free because i took the photo live when i was in that concert so i created it, it can't be deleted because is my job and i gave to this image free licence, and sorry for put the wrong day it was the 5-6-08.--Dethmyname (talk) 21:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The subsequent copyvio puts doubts in my mind as to whether you really did take the photos, too. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 21:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, because it looks uncannily like this photo here; http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/news/entertainment/galleries/1630/1/. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarked, no CC/GFDL at watermark source. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 21:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio from http://blogs.denverpost.com/reverb/2008/02/15/marilyn-manson-the-fillmore-auditorium/ and photographer Laurie Scavo. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 10:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:41, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarked, likely unfree. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 22:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.