Search results
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Vices" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- I'd like to have a peer review for this article so we can see whether it needs improving or not. I'd like to get it to a Good Article status. It's quite...3 KB (411 words) - 10:38, 10 February 2023
- history) · Watch • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like some suggestions...3 KB (367 words) - 16:15, 9 April 2012
- Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar...4 KB (525 words) - 08:21, 20 May 2022
- page I submit this article for peer review. -Kode 20:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC) Actually this article lacks sources.Vice regent 22:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)...567 bytes (82 words) - 21:08, 18 February 2008
- Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar...7 KB (885 words) - 10:00, 8 August 2009
- featured article status, but maybe for 'good article' or B class. A peer review is definitely long overdue. --ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31 23:17, 27...4 KB (519 words) - 23:23, 27 September 2010
- Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar...4 KB (397 words) - 11:08, 23 March 2022
- a few mid-sentence references. A previous peer review for this article is located at Wikipedia:Peer review/History of Georgia Tech/archive1. —Disavian...3 KB (418 words) - 13:44, 17 February 2008
- Watch peer review Previous peer review I've listed this article for peer review because the page has major improvements as per the previous peer reviews requirements...2 KB (250 words) - 00:38, 5 August 2022
- history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want to promote it to GA. I am facing some...2 KB (184 words) - 05:49, 17 April 2018
- Previous peer review Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has...3 KB (292 words) - 09:43, 10 February 2023
- Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I want this article to be qualified on merit for WP:FL. See also Failed GA Review. Thanks...2 KB (253 words) - 12:18, 28 October 2022
- Previous peer review Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review...3 KB (386 words) - 04:09, 3 April 2016
- history) · Watch • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get...4 KB (476 words) - 11:10, 23 March 2022
- history) · Watch • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because I've followed the...2 KB (201 words) - 10:00, 21 March 2012
- automated peer review and acted on it. Andrew Levine 12:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC) For the results and discussion of the automated peer review please see...7 KB (1,164 words) - 19:41, 19 February 2008
- history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review I've listed this article for peer review because I would like feedback on further developing...5 KB (548 words) - 08:19, 13 November 2022
- Shortcut WP:PR Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working...5 KB (0 words) - 18:35, 23 June 2024
- history) · Watch • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because although I hadn't...5 KB (630 words) - 10:00, 9 June 2011
- history) · Watch • Watch peer review This peer review discussion has been closed. I've listed this article for peer review because… Thanks, Perevodchik...2 KB (248 words) - 10:32, 23 March 2022
- (UTC) "Peer review" refers to the industry meaning of the word of review by related experts, copy-editors, publishers, et cetera. Peer review is essentially
- mention, etc. If he had published a book, or some articles that receive peer reviews, or your claim that he's read by millions can be substantiated, then