Wikipedia:Peer review/Sci Fi Channel (United States)/archive1
Sci Fi Channel (United States)
Seeing as the article has had its ups and downs, I was wondering what means to which can Sci Fi Channel (United States) be improved and strengthened. DrWho42 06:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- It looks decent, albeit a bit sparce in places. Here's a few (hopefully useful) comments:
- The introduction is too brief. I'd suggest another paragraph at least.
- The article could mention some previous successful and long-running shows such as Andromeda (TV series) and LEXX. It could also mention MST3K and their relatively successful TV series Dune (TV miniseries) and Children of Dune (TV miniseries).
- $1 should be linked to United States dollar. Other nations use the dollar sign for their own currency.
- The "Farscape and cancellation controversy" section needs sources.
- I don't see why the trivia section couldn't be worked into the main text.
- I'd like to see some criticism of the channel's made-for-TV movies which have become almost a cliché for really bad Sci-Fi movies in some circles.
- Thanks! — RJH (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Trivia sections are a big no-no. You can discard the non-notable or applicable information and work the rest of the text into the other sections. The Filmaker 15:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Intro should be expanded to summarize the article per WP:INTRO. Footnotes should be after punctuation with no spaces before or in between footnotes per WP:FOOT. Include triva into body of article in paragraph format per WP:AVTRIV. Group the hoaxes / controversies under another heading such as "Controversy". "See Also" goes before "References" that might be better named "Notes" per WP:GTL. On a personal question - Where is HD SciFi in the U.S.! Morphh (talk) 17:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 14:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)