Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:OSPOL" on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Oversight (redirect from OSPOL)the updated workflow and hence are visible and reversible. Shortcut WP:OSPOL This feature is approved for use in these cases: Removal of non-public personal...24 KB (2,947 words) - 19:17, 25 August 2024
- delete redirect Wikipedia:R#KEPT, criteria for keep redirect Wikipedia:OSPOL, list criteria for oversight, a higher restrictions of redactions. This...663 bytes (121 words) - 09:28, 7 January 2021
- themselves? No. Oversighting is only done in the circumstances described at WP:OSPOL. Adam9007 (talk) 17:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC) Understandable, have a great...3 KB (221 words) - 18:15, 30 September 2020
- same thing as deletion. I don't see anything meeting WP:DEL-REASON or WP:OSPOL either. As it stands your nomination doesn't specify why you'd like the...4 KB (299 words) - 23:13, 26 May 2020
- making such a disclosure (for example, minors). This is done in policy under OSPOL#1. A template like this which (currently) can only serve to identify individuals...18 KB (2,723 words) - 23:57, 9 July 2024
- derivation of OSPOL is immediately obvious to the average editor, and so it should be made clear on-wiki. I've come to understand that OSPOL is a policy...20 KB (3,052 words) - 00:23, 7 October 2021
- the IP's own edits. So per Wikipedia:Revision deletion/examples and WP:OSPOL probably not). Although this was clearly included attacks (and the editor...6 KB (859 words) - 18:58, 17 March 2024
- derivation of OSPOL is immediately obvious to the average editor, and so it should be made clear on-wiki. I've come to understand that OSPOL is a policy...6 KB (11,038 words) - 08:37, 5 October 2022
- MarkiPoli (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC) User:MarkiPoli, yes: WP:OSPOL, number 1. Folly Mox (talk) 12:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC) Yes, please ensure...19 KB (1,661 words) - 02:17, 14 November 2023
- the master and socks [5]) editing Frank Lovece, which appears to be more OSPOL-related trolling. Not sure what the oversight team's current stance there...18 KB (1,684 words) - 22:06, 13 April 2023
- edge cases. — Mhawk10 (talk) 21:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC) Comment Per WP:OSPOL the problem goes beyond mentioning real name + username, since that policy...399 KB (57,281 words) - 12:29, 14 June 2022
- editing suffices for run-of-the-mill copyvios or disruptive/insulting edits. OSPOL is very clear on the specific, limited instances when suppression is called...5 KB (10,423 words) - 08:37, 5 October 2022
- editing suffices for run-of-the-mill copyvios or disruptive/insulting edits. OSPOL is very clear on the specific, limited instances when suppression is called...14 KB (1,942 words) - 17:31, 19 October 2020
- pretty straightforward. Zaathras (talk) 02:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC) See WP:OSPOL and WP:CRD. I'm pretty sure even with oversight you would still show as...687 KB (94,824 words) - 16:49, 20 July 2022
- (UTC) I would as well, since I haven't seen any sort of communication with OSPOL-related emails... Primefac (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2021 (UTC) Courtesy ping...674 KB (93,916 words) - 20:48, 4 February 2023
- transparency, I have removed and suppressed the email addresses above per OSPOL#1. The overall context of the message has not been altered. ~TNT (she/they...692 KB (95,579 words) - 20:48, 4 February 2023
- in my view, and depending on the crime can also warrant oversight per WP:OSPOL #2 (though not in this case). GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 09:29, 8 June...710 KB (92,279 words) - 23:09, 16 September 2021
- indefinitely on plwiki. Tempest (talk) 00:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC) Trimmed per OSPOL Primefac (talk) 10:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC) @Tempest: Sorry to hear that....719 KB (95,345 words) - 14:40, 1 March 2024
- will. It's been used in the past on editor request but I don't think WP:OSPOL applies to voluntarily disclosed information that the editor doesn't want...800 KB (108,720 words) - 16:54, 2 April 2022
- be purged as well. 331dot pointed you to requests for oversight, but WP:OSPOL has a strict list of criteria. The closest would be "Removal of non-public...21 KB (2,595 words) - 03:42, 11 February 2023