Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 30" on Wikipedia
- WP:NFCCP criterion No. 1: No free equivalent. The image could be replaced by properly sourced text without using the non-free content at all. The usage in other...111 KB (10,038 words) - 11:40, 21 April 2023
- Non-free content review was a noticeboard where Wikipedians could discuss whether media files without free content licenses are in compliance with Wikipedia's...1 KB (149 words) - 16:52, 16 November 2021
- before, such as at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 55#File:Bhutan FA.png and Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 58#File:Union Internationale...119 KB (14,959 words) - 18:52, 14 May 2022
- This is an archive of nominations at Wikipedia:Non-free content review. 55 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50...5 KB (113 words) - 19:21, 17 May 2020
- fair use is claimed for a non-free image of dvd/cd/album cover displayed in the infobox which is being used to illustrate the subject of the article Andre...260 KB (38,511 words) - 07:50, 3 March 2023
- familiar with non-free image policy to comment. – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Has anyone asked for a free content image from the...177 KB (26,445 words) - 08:38, 7 March 2023
- AnomieBOT. Fails Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy #1: "No free equivalent. Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available...391 KB (56,557 words) - 09:37, 9 April 2023
- ALTON .ıl 07:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Message has been left at WT:Non-free content to enlist comments from third-party editors —Preceding unsigned comment...140 KB (20,914 words) - 23:13, 21 April 2022
- made to this discussion. Looks like it doesn't meet our non-free criteria. Removed from article. Non-admin close. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:34, 17 February 2016...28 KB (3,736 words) - 05:39, 16 March 2022
- behind the number - Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content/Archive_53#Clarification_as_to_image_resolution_for_non-free_content. It is seemingly picked at random...102 KB (13,418 words) - 08:56, 10 February 2023
- supports the current use of the three listed non-free images after the addition of appropriately sourced content creating contextual significance. -- ТимофейЛееСуда...132 KB (17,798 words) - 10:41, 29 May 2022
- previously closed conversation which can now be found at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 9#File:Khalid-Saeed.jpg. The primary new issue regarding possible...111 KB (17,083 words) - 12:33, 4 June 2022
- Use of non-free material ought to be minimal. Masem's explanation is convincing, and their advice worth following. That this makes for a less attractive...110 KB (14,369 words) - 07:50, 3 March 2023
- a non-free content (not each article where such content is being used) requires a separate, specific non-free use rationale. Each usage of non-free content...100 KB (11,805 words) - 05:39, 16 March 2022
- {{discussion top}} I uploaded some non-free album cover arts in order to replace the ones that were already in use. The reason I did this is because the...122 KB (17,975 words) - 23:30, 2 March 2023
- be made to this discussion. Non-Admin Closure: Discussion previously closed at Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review/Archive_35#Caverns_of_Mars#Sequels. Reasoning...128 KB (16,866 words) - 07:29, 26 March 2023
- (crest).svg, Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 69#File:Croatia football federation.png, Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 69#File:FC Barcelona...63 KB (5,425 words) - 19:25, 23 April 2022
- was fixed yesterday (see Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 35#Caverns of Mars#Sequels), but the non-free gallery was immediately restored. --Stefan2...117 KB (12,007 words) - 10:32, 30 January 2023
- fair use police. This had a bit of discussion at Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 72#File:New York Cosmos originalcrest.png, but admittedly not...100 KB (13,269 words) - 05:39, 16 March 2022
- Image in question deleted by Courcelles on 1 January as an orphaned non-free image. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC) The following discussion...102 KB (12,662 words) - 15:48, 29 May 2022
- "RfC: A Free Content and Expression Definition", in particular my post at May 4 in the spin-off thread "A Wikisource Definition" concerning non-derivative
- Delete. Vanity page for a non-notable person. —LrdChaos 14:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do