Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 110" on Wikipedia
- it violates our neutral point of view policy. We don't take sides. We report original, pro, and con positions neutrally, using neutral language. You are...249 KB (34,537 words) - 21:57, 29 June 2024
- Biden's fault. Being "true" does not mean being neutral, and this is the Neutral point of view noticeboard. Neither argument belongs in this article. Neither...406 KB (54,940 words) - 20:25, 20 July 2024
- WP:Neutral Point of View and just doesn't belong here [especially at a noticeboard about specific violations]; no bias is involved, and it's the kind of...251 KB (37,355 words) - 18:21, 14 April 2023
- example Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard/Archive_17#Racism_in_the_Palestinian_territories), the discussion of the scope of Racism in the Palestinian...251 KB (36,219 words) - 05:45, 1 May 2022
- a number of reliable sources state "underwear") a matter appropriate for this noticeboard as being one of violating the neutral point of view policy by...245 KB (33,619 words) - 07:55, 3 March 2023
- will not bother the Neutral point of view/Noticeboard with my expertise on the matter since that would be inappropriate for this type of situation. Sincerely...262 KB (34,409 words) - 17:48, 28 January 2023
- (talk) 20:19, 16 October 2013 (UTC) I point out that this is the neutral point of view noticeboard. Discussion of your questioned behavior in doing several...245 KB (35,517 words) - 07:55, 3 March 2023
- June 2017 (UTC) Looks good. i would put something like "per neutral point of view noticeboard discussion" in the edit summary. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:38...238 KB (34,909 words) - 16:47, 31 May 2024
- persons/Noticeboard#Anthony Watts (blogger) WP:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Anthony Watts (blogger) WP:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Anthony Watts (blogger)NewsAndEventsGuy...219 KB (32,224 words) - 07:55, 3 March 2023
- violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 28#Taliban and then he has not added a denial (as sourced in the lead) with it. The rest of the...276 KB (40,808 words) - 05:42, 10 May 2024
- promote their point of view rather than aiming for a neutral point of view. At the moment most of the article content in competing versions is concerned...256 KB (37,571 words) - 17:49, 28 January 2023
- January 2013 (UTC) Hello. First of all, thank you for notifying me about the Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion. I was uncertain where...252 KB (37,293 words) - 10:35, 30 January 2023
- explain their addition; editors should be conscious of the need to maintain a neutral point of view when creating categories or adding them to articles...254 KB (36,488 words) - 14:36, 29 July 2023
- == Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion == There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding...237 KB (31,769 words) - 04:50, 12 June 2023
- direct result of Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard)#RfC: Does the title, hatnote, and lead of this article adhere to the neutral point of view policy? is...245 KB (34,579 words) - 10:34, 30 January 2023
- requires a neutral point of view: regardless of the reasons for making the fork, it still must be titled and written in a neutral point of view. It could...336 KB (36,218 words) - 16:02, 21 April 2023
- Cydevil38 (talk) 00:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC) Notice: this interpretation of Neutral Point of View is thriving while the projects encyclopedians are standing idly...253 KB (35,855 words) - 13:11, 15 February 2024
- (UTC) The purpose of this board is to discuss whether article content is compliant with the Neutral Point of View (NPOV) policy. Conflict of interest concerns...237 KB (31,668 words) - 07:54, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#"Genocide_denial"_and_Uyghurs. It ended up inviting more discussion here than at the talk page of the relevant...233 KB (28,110 words) - 07:54, 3 March 2023
- I do not see an infringement of NPOV policy. Cinadon36 17:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC) It is not a neutral point of view, i.e. "representing fairly, proportionately...244 KB (33,901 words) - 07:25, 12 January 2023
- large selections of quotes, with the poor justification that he was fixing the articles so that they would have a neutral point of view. However, that did
- drastically differs from my understanding.... I've always operated from the point of view that assigning the "Source file must be fixed before proofreading" status