Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of recreation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus . No consensus to delete at this time. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:12, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of recreation

A broad broad dictionary word. Unsuitable for an outline. Recreation organizations would be a huge list of topics just for sports. "What type of thing is recreation?" is a weird question with no logical answer. Legacypac (talk) 01:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Being a broad concept topic is actually a good rationale for retaining the page, rather than deleting it. I have copy edited the draft a bit for organization. Can easily be expanded from Category:Recreation. Regarding the notion of "recreation" being a dictionary word, the nominator here could nominate the recreation article for deletion per WP:DICDEF, but I seriously doubt the article would be deleted at AfD under this notion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is fine to have a page about the topic, and list pages about portions of the broad topic, but an outline on this is going to be unwieldy. Legacypac (talk) 02:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unwieldly isn't really a valid reason to delete, though. For example, if the page were to become very long, it could split, as per WP:SIZERULE. Also, various topical aspects can easily be organized using sections, to ease reading. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – I have expanded the draft a bit, to provide more content. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WikiProjects outlines should be archived but not deleted. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD should not scope-creed to WikiProject Management. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - An outline that has empty sections is an abandoned outline, and abandoned outlines do not serve a purpose. A List of abandoned outlines might be sufficient. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed I have removed the empty sections, which was accomplished by WP:COPYEDITING the draft. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.