Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Joe Bermudez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Joe Bermudez

Well, where to start here. We have a highly inactive WikiProject created three quarter of a year ago (approx), since then its had only five edits - with one of them being me nominating it for deletion. it has one participant and its only goal is to get Joe Bermudez to FA status which it is no where near, with its last edit being nearly two months ago by a bot. A task force would have been more appropriate, not a WikiProject. Tellyaddict 11:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. YechielMan 13:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Herostratus 14:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - John Carter 16:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Bushcarrot (Talk·Guestbook) 00:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete too narrow scope. Wooyi^{Talk, Editor review} 02:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, extremely narrow scope of exactly one article. Use Talk:Joe Bermudez. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 23:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — can't delete (not a sysop :), so roll-on pile-on ;) regards, anthony^[cfc] 00:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.