Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was Keep. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
There's Wikipedia humor, and then there's this. It's a random spat of irrelevant lines. Compare this to WP:LAME, WP:ABF or WP:BRRR which are cohesive and understandable. This is not that. I don't even know what policy to quote here, but I'm sure someone will come along and provide something more insightful. elektrikSHOOS(editing from a public terminal) 14:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - no argument advanced for deletion. –xenotalk 14:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral - I found it amusing a few years ago, but don't feel horribly attached to it now. People who are more hip on what's allowed in the Wikipedia namespace should decide this as they will. Philwelch (talk) 18:14, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Valid reflections related to the project. I do wish that there were better attribution of the content, but this is not a reason to delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep
But get someone to re-write it.~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 04:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)- Any opinion to take an editorial action in an xFD discussion should be taken as that editor xyrself directly volunteering to use xyr own tools to take that editorial action. Short version: "Someone" is you. Uncle G (talk) 13:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 00:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- How about I just put an SEP Field around the article? ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 16:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Any opinion to take an editorial action in an xFD discussion should be taken as that editor xyrself directly volunteering to use xyr own tools to take that editorial action. Short version: "Someone" is you. Uncle G (talk) 13:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep but trim, valid humour page. Stifle (talk) 10:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Wikipedia is also like the Earth's description in HHGTTG. Collect (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- I agree completely. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 16:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep but trim the article. Secret Saturdays (talk to me)what's new? 19:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep or userfy (to my space) if consensus is to delete. Ⓢock 02:40, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Random lines is the point. If you can't cite a policy for deleting this, please don't waste our time by nominating something for deletion with a worthless rationale behind it. Thanks, —fetch·comms 02:45, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.