Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term Abuse/Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:49, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Long-term Abuse/Cyberpunk2077JohnnySilverhand

WP:DENY and I'd hardly call a year old sock puppet (not even a year!) "long term" PICKLEDICAE🥒 12:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly not "long term" obviously. But I think it is "huge volume" kind of vandal. 50 confirmed globally locked socks, and further 17 suspected. I think some kind of documentation might be helpful. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 07:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Vandals like this are why WP:DENY exists. They're obvious. There is no need for an LTA page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 10:54, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I created the page (in Draft namespace), I would like to comment on it. I created the page as I found that this user is a cross wiki abuser with a LTA page in Chinese Wikipedia. I do not know how "long term" is how long in English Wikipedia, but the definition of long term abuse in Chinese Wikipedia is at least 1 month. 132.234.228.113 (talk) 08:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And the word "Abuse" in the title should be "abuse" as it is the subpage of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse. 132.234.228.226 (talk) 08:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to say that there are several sockpuppet accounts being blocked as long term abuse (examples: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10). Some accounts are also globally locked as long term abuse. 132.234.228.51 (talk) 02:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think the length of time is long enough that an LTA case could be beneficial in some cases but it doesn't seem that an LTA case is beneficial here. I haven't looked through every contribution but the vandalism seems obvious enough that no context is needed to identify it as problematic. I Google Translated the zhwiki page and it doesn't look like there's any untranslated information that would be helpful to identify edits as vandalism either. If the page is not deleted, the creator is right that it should be renamed with "Abuse" being lowercase. PhantomTech[talk] 03:26, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note I have attempted to fix the MfD template. ~ Matthewrb ^{Talk to me · Changes I've made} 17:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.