Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Sr 13 07:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by language

This list of Wikipedians is unmaintained, hopelessly incomplete, and wholly redundant to Category:Wikipedians by language. I see no reason to retain it. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Delete all. When I looked at each of them all I could think is "why the heck?" — $PЯINGrαgђ 19:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. All either redundant or useless. Hut 8.5 20:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The language list is definitely useful, but is redundant to babel boxes and the associated categories. --BigDT 21:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant becaiuse of babel, way too hard to maintain.GreaterWikiholic 21:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above—arf! 04:25, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 'Surrealist Wikipedians' page. This is as much a light-hearted attempt at humour as a serious attempt to provide a coherent list. (How could a Surrealist Wikipedians page have a wholly serious purpose?) Perhaps a {humor} tag and placement in the relevant category would suffice. Ben MacDui (Talk) 09:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Redundant to Babel, nonsense pages. --tennis man 14:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as they are all unnecessarry due to either useless or redundancy. Acalamari 19:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green--it seems to be used to provide information. Probably should eventually become a list for a wikiproject, though. DGG 04:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We already have wikipedia babel and it really is not overly logical to have two things that serve the same purpose. For that reason, this should be deleted.--†Sir James Paul† 04:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all For this application, categories are much more effective than lists. Yechiel Man 08:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, as unencyclopedic as the categories, which ought to be deleted as well. (Unfortunately, WP:ILIKEIT won out over WP:MYSPACE in that discussion.) —Angr 18:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete all as redundant. — The Storm Surfer 03:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as unmaintainable and not belonging to an encyclopedia, you can use the userboxes for some of those 'facts'. GB 08:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.