Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Defunct request. Please Don't Consider!
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep, revert move back to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SSG123, and courtesy blank. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Apparently a failed attempt to create a request for adminship Lunacats (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hello! Unfortunately yes! This was a failed attempt of mine to create a request for adminship. Please delete this page as soon as possibe. Thanks, SSG123 (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- No comments on the merits of the deletion request, just a note that the history of the talk page likely makes this ineligible for G7. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Revert move, close as withdrawn, and courtesy-blank. Regarding the content on talk: SSG123 has said they will not loutsock in the future, and I appreciate that; however, the RfA does still serve as an important record of an incident that led to a serious warning, and one which may recur as an issue since they do appear to still be editing from that IP range (currnetly in a manner allowed by policy, but just barely). Thus I think the most equitable solution is to preserve in the history but cblank, at the original title. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Revert move and Courtesy blank per Tamzin. Normally we would delete this kind of stuff under G6 or G7, but I agree that the fact that the creator tried to sock and support their own RFA should be preserved because it is highly relevant information that should be kept in mind when considering giving this user advanced rights. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 13:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Revert move and courtesy blank per the above: this strikes the right balance between preserving a record of this incident and preventing unnecessary embarrassment. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.