Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WilliamWQuick

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. As outlined in this section, usage of your main userpage is an acceptable substitute for a sandbox. If it wasn't this users intention, then someone can show him/her how to do this. Furthermore, it should have been mentioned before the MfD and not during. I'd also recomend that someone should mention COI to him as well. Synergy 15:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:WilliamWQuick

Rationale The user namespace is not the place where articles should be tested before creation. In addition, the so-called "references" listed seem to only promote companies and don't mention a "Mr. Quick" in any of the pages. If he wants a Sandbox, we can help him with that. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 17:31, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some people use their main userpage as a sandbox. I guess you could be bold and move it to a /sandbox subpage, since the user probably didn't know how and might not mind it. -- Ned Scott 03:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.