Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/cleavage-support

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts she/theytalk/stalk 05:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:UBX/cleavage-support

User:UBX/cleavage-support (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:UPNOT, this userbox is irrelevant and continues the perception of Wikipedia as a boy's club. QuietCicada chirp 14:41, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to quick agree per nom, but National Cleavage Day is real, and happens every year. So I think it is merely corny. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mild keep (although moving it out of UBX might be an option)
While I can see nom’s rationale, that is not what the actual holiday is about.
I’ll refrain from mansplaining about “big boob problems” and just note that although it’s a “commercially insprired” holiday à la Hallmark, it’s a movement to promote body positivity in the Global South.
Also, over a dozen users are transcluding it, none of whom have been notified (I assume).
RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 14:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete That trash has no place on Wikipedia. We already have a shortage of woman editors. Scorpions1325 (talk) 02:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.