Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TenPoundHammer (3rd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: WP:FOOLS. — xaosflux Talk 00:27, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:TenPoundHammer

User:TenPoundHammer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User appears to be non-existent. Clubjustin Talkosphere 02:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • False. The editor definitely exists and has been causing trouble left and right. See, for example, this thread. It appears that he's not made nearly enough prank nominations for our more serious-minded administrators, and he's only managed to break one feature of Twitter. Way to fall short of your quota, dude. Rather than deleting him over his disappointing lassitude, I suggest that we help him out by renaming him to User:TenPoundHammer on Wheels. Rebbing 03:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • True. This is one of them alternative Facts. I call FAKE NEWS! - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.