Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SqlPac

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn. I apologize to SqlPac because I overreacted: having seen one inappropriate userbox (which was deleted), I nominated all of them, and that was uncalled for on my part. Yechiel Man 18:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:SqlPac

I am nominating User:SqlPac's personal templates for being ill-humored. You are free to vote "keep" on some and "delete" on others, but I want to keep the discussion in one place. They are:

Yechiel Man 15:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All. WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_censored. BTW, I could not locate User:YechielMan finds something ill-humored on the list of reasons for deletion at Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Reasons_for_deletion. It may have as much to do with your sense of humor as with the templates. SqlPac 16:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have deleted User:SqlPac/No bureaucrats under CSD T1 - Templates that are divisive and inflammatory. Adambro 15:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment. I changed it so it is no longer divisive or inflammatory. It simply echoes my deep and profound love for the official Wikipedia policy at WP:NOT#BUREAUCRACY. SqlPac 15:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Modified your request to properly reflect all as opposed to some. I got rid of the User:SqlPac/Tool Use 1 template, since it was probably most offensive to your sense of humor. SqlPac 16:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the nomination accordingly. Yechiel Man 16:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Cool. Can you can help me nominate some userboxes for deletion? I found the following ill-humored, divisive, inflammatory, and unhelpful. I've categorized them to make it easier for you: (deleted/wangi 17:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Keep no valid reason for deletion given. -N 18:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it seems to be just humorous and I don't find it offensive. --Kevin Murray 18:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep First of all, shouldn't these have gone to WP:TfD? However, there is nothing offensive about these User Boxes, they exist in user space, and they are being transcluded onto a user's page. ill-humored is not a valid reason to delete User Boxes. --Farix (Talk) 12:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The deletion rationale provided by the nominator is invalid. According to the userbox page, userboxes are allowed to be what they are right now, plus the fact that Wikipedia is not censored. (→zel zany - fish) 00:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.