Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Psychomelodic/me

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, and having a brief look at uses there doesn't seem to be a need to subst it (all have the user link and date in addition to the template). Thanks/wangi 12:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signature template. (Need I elaborate? I hope not.) —ptk✰fgs 14:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete G7/U1, author blanked the page. YechielMan 16:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking here doesn't really seem like as good a reason for speedying as it would normally be, since the transclusion remains. --Sneftel 16:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Delete anyway per nom: not the sort of thing I want to see on a talk page. YechielMan 18:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove all transclusions and subst with a phrase of the user's choice so the previous signatures make sense. No need to delete this as long as it's always substituted (and preferably the total signature length should be within 255 characters). –Pomte 19:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - Subst all transclusions of the signature and then speedy it. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete I agree to subst the transclusions so as to not cause confusion, etc.  hmwith  talk 17:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.