Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pentjuuu!.!/sandbox
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Withdraw. (non-admin closure) MxYamato (talk) 08:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
User:Pentjuuu!.!/sandbox
Outdated/irrelevant content on sandbox of indefinitely checkuser blocked user. Page is 59th largest on the English Wikipedia with a size ~2 million bytes [1]. Last contribution of user in October 2016. MxYamato (talk) 06:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Why not use {{Inactive userpage blanked}}? SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Because there is as of now no chance of the user returning to edit, and the info is 6 years old, as per usage on the template you have referred to. MxYamato (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- How do you know the user has no chance of returning. Maybe check with User:Drmies as to that certainty, but not that the standard language used does not say that. Checkuser blocks are forgivable, but are not decided at MfD. Presuming won’t return is a self-fulfilling prophesy. “6 years” is not a criterion that I know of. Random users should not be randomly policing others userspace. Are you connected? Do you know something we don’t? If you don’t have good answers, the blank with {{Inactive userpage blanked}}. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, is it possible then to close this MfD nomination? I’m not sure if I should do it myself. I wasn’t policing btw, I was just looking at the largest pages which possibly could be deleted. MxYamato (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think old very large pages are perfect candidates for blanking. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Fine, but what about this nom? Will you close it? MxYamato (talk) 08:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- You can withdraw and speedy close. Or you could just write “withdraw, and blank it if you agree that is a good outcome, and leave it for someone else to close. I should not close as I am INVOLVED in the discussion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Fine, but what about this nom? Will you close it? MxYamato (talk) 08:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think old very large pages are perfect candidates for blanking. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Agree, is it possible then to close this MfD nomination? I’m not sure if I should do it myself. I wasn’t policing btw, I was just looking at the largest pages which possibly could be deleted. MxYamato (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- How do you know the user has no chance of returning. Maybe check with User:Drmies as to that certainty, but not that the standard language used does not say that. Checkuser blocks are forgivable, but are not decided at MfD. Presuming won’t return is a self-fulfilling prophesy. “6 years” is not a criterion that I know of. Random users should not be randomly policing others userspace. Are you connected? Do you know something we don’t? If you don’t have good answers, the blank with {{Inactive userpage blanked}}. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Because there is as of now no chance of the user returning to edit, and the info is 6 years old, as per usage on the template you have referred to. MxYamato (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.