Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kitia/Nopage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Coredesat 05:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is pointless. Need I say more? ANNAfoxlover 23:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Uhh... that's the point. And, by the way, keep out of my personal pages. Kitia 23:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Please remain civil. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs • reviews)} 01:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Plenty of others have small prank pages like this.--James, La gloria è a dio 02:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep users are allowed to have prank pages, and pages in userspace doesn't necessarily have to have a point to them. Hut 8.5 11:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • At least the second one should be deleted. ANNAfoxlover 16:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why are the two any different? Hut 8.5 20:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep productive editors are given leeway on useless stuff in userspace. -N 20:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As long as the editors are productive and actually contributing to the encyclopedia than such pages are ok. (to a certain degree) -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 05:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Productive editor just looking to have a bit of fun. —Crazytales (public computer) ^{(talk) (main)} 11:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.