Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ilmari Karonen/First link

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010(talk) 04:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ilmari Karonen/First link

User:Ilmari Karonen/First link (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT, user is barely active, content does not seem notable. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Worthy usespace material. Not "stale". No valid reasons offered for deletion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per SmokeyJoe. The page is related to Wikipedia. Graham87 07:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: not a draft. It's something statistical that might well belong in projectspace. Cf. WP:STATS. I admit this is an unconventional analysis (i.e., based on an internet meme), it's still something relevant and worth discussing in terms of article building (for instance, if this is a problem, and if so, what can be done to mitigate it). —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 14:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Mendaliv, as a relevant analysis of Wikipedia —PC-XT+ 22:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Probably nominated by mistake, it's not a draft article. --Nemo 15:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.