Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete - it's unanimous. WilyD 06:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dwain/Republican Celebrities Page (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm assuming that this article was moved into user space so that it could be improved and moved back into the mainspace. That hasn't happened. Instead it has become a sanctuary for any anonymous IP to come and add a celebrity to the list, most often without any sort of reference. We don't keep deleted articles in user space indefinitely, and I think it is time to delete this. It has existed for over four years and still isn't an article. AniMate 09:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Indiscriminate and unmanageable coatrack list of largely unverifiable trivia that does not stand a snowball's chance of ever becoming an article again. No possible encyclopedic value. I don't see any credible evidence of it being used in any way to improve the project. Major BLP nightmare as well, as many of the entries are unsourced, unsourceable and dubious. Some of those included are no longer republicans, and may not have ever been. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 10:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per above: mostly unsourced list with potential BLP implications, with no prospect of making it back into article space. Robofish (talk) 14:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Of dubious merit for the project, but worse, it (talk page & history) contains old unanswered allegations of error and a lack of verification. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. per above. --Kleinzach 01:34, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.