Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dave Harton
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy Delete . (non-admin closure) BangJan1999 13:04, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- User:Dave Harton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
WP:UP#COPIES, WP:HOARD, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:FAKEARTICLE.
Recreation of article content that was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Chase (UK game show) episodes.
See also:
- Talk:The Chase (UK game show)/Archive 1#Chaser records
- Talk:The Chase (UK game show)/Archive 1#Episode results.
- Talk:The Chase (UK game show)/Archive 1#A place for the missing details AldezD (talk) 02:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Refer to the deleting admin, User:Seraphimblade. That AfD does not look unanimous, and it is the closer's prerogative as to whether it may be userfied for improvement, or no, the community decided no. If it may be userfied, a history merge is required. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- As a note, User:Dave Harton isn't exactly the same content as the deleted versions of List of The Chase (UK game show) episodes. However, the general topic is, of course, the same. The page up for deletion has much more detailed information. I'm about to relist thist to generate more discussion as to the merits of the userpage. Killiondude (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Fails every deletion point argued at AfD. The extra detail is just more not-notability-attesting primary source material. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Per U5: Blatant WP:NOTWEBHOST violations BangJan1999 01:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.