Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Crinos43

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Thanks/wangi 10:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Crinos43

This "user page" hurts Jimbo's eyes. User has made few encyclopedic contributions and has not been active for months. Contested prod. MER-C 10:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. That link does not obviously tell me that Jimbo does not like this user page. The user has made a few contributions since writing the user page. The page is not great but it is not offensive and breaks not rules that I can see. --Bduke 11:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bduke. Since the user has some edits, and the userpage is not blatant advertising, there is no need to delete it. Yechiel Man 16:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since this page is about his real life then keep. If he had more than one page about his real life than I would have all but one deleted and if this page was not about his real life or wikipedia I would have it deleted but this is fine.--James, La gloria è a dio 18:38, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I assume I'm missing something because that interview is talking about MySpace, not the userpage of some random Wikipedian. I'm seeing nowhere enough grounds for deletion. --Agamemnon2 19:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment MER-C, will you please go into more detail on why this should be deleted? I do not see any reasons to delete this currently. Thanks:)--James, La gloria è a dio 19:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can't see any reason to delete this userpage. There's nothing harmful here and the user has some edits. Hut 8.5 20:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: User may not be active on Wikipedia but still has made some edits. --_Hdt83 ^Chat 00:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well...its not wrong in any way. As you guys said, he has some edits. Tell him to change his page or introduce him to Wikipedia:User page.
Keep It hurts my eyes, but she made some good contribs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sethdoe92 (talk • contribs)
Keep The user page seems fine. Acalamari 03:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is close to border line, but haven't stepped over the line yet. OhanaUnited ^{Talk page} 03:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everyone above. I cannot see any reason to delete this—arf! 06:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Short userpage where he gives some basic info about himself. Well within acceptable userpage parameters. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- per all of the above. Eddie 21:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't see any reason to delete it. I'm not about ready to consign my deletion rationale to attempting to divine some kind of contextual meaning from Jimbo's every off-the-cuff remark in order to apply it to Wikipedia. --Haemo 07:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.