Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BlankVerse/TFD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep, but blank Optigan13 (talk) 05:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:BlankVerse/TFD

Abandoned sandbox template by retired user. Last remaining template in a task force conversion for project banner. I would have tagged with a deprecated marker if this was in Wikipedia space, but it's not. So I'm bringing it to MFD Optigan13 (talk) 02:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep in MfD. TfD might be apt. No reason to delete as userspace violation, and user is in good statnding, and has previously been absent for long periods of time. Collect (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - it isn't doing any harm. We don't normally delete sandboxes of users in good standing. Graham87 01:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Would a simple blanking of the page be ok? I'm just trying to clear the category. This user is in good standing and I don't feel this is a userspace violation of any kind. I just am trying to perform some cleanup of the categories. A revert of the page at any time would be ok. This was the only item that wasn't in project space, which is why I didn't do a CFD on the category itself. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, that'd be fine. But leave *some* tex there , like "this template has been deprecated; see the page history." A totally blank page could cause confusion. Graham87 16:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.