Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Blackture/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep and blank. Will tag with {{Inactive userpage blanked}}. RL0919 (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Blackture/sandbox

Patent nonsense, violation of WP:UP#GOALS , WP:NOTAWEBHOST. User’s last contribution was on 8 June 2020, 2 years back. All their contributions are limited to their own user space. Other user page(s) are in a similar state. This page is the 47th largest on the English Wikipedia (see: https://xtools.wmflabs.org/largestpages/en.wikipedia.org?include_pattern=&exclude_pattern=). MxYamato (talk) 05:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that as a rule, you first consider blanking very large pages when the author is long inactive. {{Inactive userpage blanked}} was made for things like this. You can do that as a simple edit, no formalities required, but ideally explain why in the edit summary.

I suggest that inactive user is never a big part of a deletion rationale. If it is ok for and active user, then it is ok for an inactive user. There are no timelimits. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you on the other page, but this one is plain gibberish? MxYamato (talk) 08:36, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t agree that “gibberish” is a reason to delete a sandbox. Gibberish includes testing, and sandboxes are intended for it, and users should not be asked to explain their testing in sandboxes. There may be something offensive in it, but merely being gibberish is not offensive for a sandbox. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UP#GOALS are very liberally interpreted in userspace.

For NOTAWEBHOST, the deletion nominator needs to explain how they think it is being used for external purposes. I think the content does not look useful to others. I think that https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2020-05-14&end=2022-06-03&pages=User:Blackture/sandbox is evidence against it being used as a webhost. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not asking anyone to explain their test edits. I’m saying that this user has content that is gibberish, quite old, and the 47th largest page we have on enWP. Usual testing generally does not include ~2 million bytes. My point is given the sheer size, and the age and incomprehensibility, this page should be deleted. MxYamato (talk) 08:57, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to delete it. It's a sandbox. Just blank the page... WaltCip-(talk) 21:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - It's a sandbox. User:MxYamato - Please stop ragpicking large sandboxes. They are full of silicon dioxide. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MxYamato. starship .paint (exalt) 03:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and blank It's a sandbox, gibberish isn't a reason to delete it. We could blank it though for decongestion. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and blank per SmokeyJoe. Also @MxYamato note that the page was not tagged for mfd, which I have added just now. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, blank if needed It's a sandbox. The damage is done; deleted articles are kept in server space, so this page's deletion will accomplish nothing. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 22:30, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete inappropriate tones are facing-to-facing {{db-attack}} if no conflicts. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an attack page; it's just character spam. G10 does not apply. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.