Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bernstein2291/Longest Autograph Book

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was "Keep" The user has also renamed the page to "User:Bernstein2291/Autograph Book" Acalamari 23:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bernstein2291/Longest Autograph Book

Bernstein2291 says he's trying to make his book the longest on Wikipedia, which is completely missing the whole point of autograph books. Either delete this page or make sure that it is turned into just a normal autograph book. ANNAfoxlover 00:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest removing "longest" from name. bibliomaniac 1 5 Join or die! 01:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I am all for that! I will suggest it to User:Bernstein2291. 71.213.133.103 01:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - So do I. And make sure it doesn't try to be the longest. ANNAfoxlover 01:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - This has nothing to do with your goal of trying to collect the signature of every Wikipedian, does it? :) --- RockMFR 01:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Who cares? Make sure it is a normal autograph book? We don't need to micromanage autograph pages. --- RockMFR 01:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep even Jimbo has said autograph books don't harm the project. -N 11:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Can't hurt? Gutworth (talk) 19:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.