Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AlvinJamesSaldanha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Rough consensus exists that this is a WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. Wikipedia is not the place to post/host resumes. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:AlvinJamesSaldanha

WP:NOTWEBHOST. User has contributions outside of userspace however they are almost all 5+ years old, the user page was created somewhat recently. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 01:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Autobiographical user pages aren't unusual. This user page should be fine as long as he doesn't attempt to turn it into an article. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mellohi! WP:UPYES mentions limited autobiographical content. This page seems more like a resume and has no mention of anything related to Wikipedia, it may be more about self-promotion than Wikipedia. Being written in 3rd person, WP:FAKEARTICLE is likely also relevant. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 02:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning.

I will not be attempting to turn this into an article. There is PLENTY about me on the internet and this was not an attempt to be featured on wikipedia. I use wikipedia a great deal and correct a great many grammar and spelling mistakes, even if I am not logged in. It would be wonderful to have this not deleted, but I respect your decision.223.182.97.2 (talk) 03:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin J Saldanha 223.182.97.2 (talk) 03:46, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. This really looks like resume and self-promotion to me. —Sundostund (talk) 13:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This looks like web hosting of a resume. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although there's a lot of latitude in userspace, I've come to think that it's incorrect to extend that to pages that look like articles (indeed, BLPs), especially when they contain a lot of content that's irrelevant to someone's work at Wikipedia. (Also, if it's to be kept, a user page that's this similar to an article should have {{userpage}} substed onto it to reduce confusion, especially due to the possibility that it gets picked up in mirrors – I've done that.) --ais523 12:04, 5 July 2022 (U T C)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.