Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Varadkar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Varadkar

Completely unnecessary page. Talk pages of redirects are usually deleted after an RM establishes a wp:primary topic, e.g. Talk:Gladstone, Talk:Van Buren. --Nevé –selbert 19:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appropriate talk page redirect to match the title redirect. Normal and common, serves small but important purposes. So some page movers don't know when to check a button or not. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:41, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SmokeyJoe. Redirects usually do have talk pages attached to them, either with a note saying it's a redirect (as this one does), or acting as redirects themselves. — Amakuru (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There's a possibly relevant, but likely difficult to follow discussion at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 62#G6 should not be used to create permanent redlinks in namespace 1. – Uanfala 08:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.