Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Pearl Brewing Company/Images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. $Salvio$ 16:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Pearl Brewing Company/Images

Not complying with Wikipedian scope (WP:NOTGALLERY). A better collection of images ecists at Commons:Category:Pearl_Brewing_Company. Several pf the images here have been transferred there thru FileEx/Importer, but I marked some images here for deletion because of their questionable nature and histories, whether Speedy Deletion or FFD. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a subpage in article talk space is not an appropriate place for an image gallery. -- Whpq (talk) 13:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Happy for this to be deleted. I moved the images from the article to a subpage of the talkpage in 2008 to allow people to look at the images to see if they were OK to use in the article. By now, people should have been able to make that decision. SilkTork (talk) 18:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per above, can be moved to Commons. Robert McClenon (talk) 11:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: I already transferred those worthy at Commons there, categorized under Commons:Category:Pearl Brewing Company. Those undeserving, with questionable histories and/or no permissions, have been either put at FFD or speedy delete (no sources and/or permissions). As for the question below, I cannot comment, though in my first impression FFD is reserved for those under namespace "File:." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Well, well. A subpage of an article talk page is within the scope of MFD, but would these discussions, like those of Timed Text files, be better at FFD? Robert McClenon (talk) 11:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the correct venue for the discussion. The nominator is already dealing with the specific images as noted in the nomination. The question is whether this talk subpage (as a whole) should be deleted, and not whether specific files should be deleted. -- Whpq (talk) 14:11, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move relevant info to Commons and delete - Per WP:NOTGALLERY, there's no reason to maintain this on an enwiki talk subpage. Move all of the correctly licensed images to Commons, make sure they're all categorized properly over there, and then add a link to the Commons category on the main article and delete the subpage. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 01:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are already two links to Commons on the main article, one Wikidata-generated (at the left) and the other generated by {{Commons category}} at the bottom. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.