Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kylie Minogue (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:15, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Kylie Minogue

Another single performer portal. Fails WP:POG on limited scope. Her nav box and head article do a better nob assisting readers with exploring her life and work. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kylie Minogue has interesting comments including one person who said it was a tricked out nav box. Legacypac (talk) 19:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC) Legacypac (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, along with all subpages. The featured head article with its excellent navboxes is a vastly better navigational hub. This is just another WP:REDUNDANTFORK ... and per countless other recent discussions, the topic is too narrow to satisfy WP:POG, which says that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Yet another single-performer heritage portal by an inactive editor. As BrownHairedGirl says, navboxes are better. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:52, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Old portal, 22 subpages, created 2011-01-13 01:51:24 by User:IHelpWhenICan. A comment by a maintainer, if any, could make the day. Portal:Kylie Minogue. Pldx1 (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.