Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Indore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Indore (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Old portal that was "under construction" for years for TTH restarted it [1]. The lack of maintenance interest is best illustrated by the "In the News" from 2008-2012 Legacypac (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Question. @Legacypac, the nomination describes the portal's history. What exactly is the basis for the proposed deletion? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Heritage portal created by now-inactive user. This portal has too many redlinks. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• This is woefully undermaintained to the point where it no longer serves it's intended purpose. Delete unless an active editor can be found to update and then maintain it. Tazerdadog (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The city/urban area of Indore has 4 million inhabitants, and is a state commercial capital; there's also a district and a division to go at, and plenty of material in the categories. The head article on the city is C class, level 4 vital, with no orange-level tags. The portal was created old style in 2012, but appears to have been largely abandoned with only one selected article & image, and the latest news in Oct 2012. There appears to be consensus that The Transhumanist's portal creation/reboot methods are not supported. I think there might be scope for a portal subject to the quality of the available articles, but neither version of this is it. Espresso Addict (talk) 22:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Soft Delete with no prejudice against recreation of a more function portal. This version prior to automation has all of the core components of a functional portal, but it needs expansion with more selected content, etc. and an ability to be purged to view various content. In terms of content availability, the topic itself meets WP:POG, in my opinion, although perhaps on a somewhat weaker level. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Old portal, 18 subpages, created 2012-11-08 16:29:44 by User:Parik92. TTH was probably right when nuking the former version. No trace of a former Portal:Indore/Selected article/2. Far worse than usual navbox. Portal:Indore. Pldx1 (talk) 11:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.