Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Drafts by RoboShutter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. $Salvio$ 09:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts by RoboShutter

A set of drafts created by several members of a now-blocked sockfarm (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sachin110892); these are not likely to be mainspaced any time soon, and leaving them in draftspace until they can be G13'd would just encourage further socking. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - I have not researched the history of these drafts in detail, but it looks as if some of them might just possibly maybe be improved by neutral editors. None of the usual reasons for deletion, such as never being going to be an article, or repeated resubmission. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If a non-sock wants to work on them, they will be trivial to recreate. DGG ( talk ) 20:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Fails wp:GNG and sockfarm QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 00:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: What neutral editors would possibly be rummaging through draftspace searching for long-forgotten drafts to improve? If by some wild chance someone wants to create an article on one of these subjects, he can. Ravenswing 05:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.