Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The Handmaid's Tale Novel - Parents' Guide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Doesn't seem to intend to become an encyclopedia article, but there is clearly not enough will to delete this. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Handmaid's Tale Novel - Parents' Guide

Violation of WP:NOTESSAY, WP:NOTWEBHOST, and WP:NOTGUIDE. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 19:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - It's a draft. It needed declining or rejecting. The reasons given are reasons to decline or reject a submission,and it was declined. It may or may not be able to be made either into an article or part of an article by attributing the opinions to reliable sources. The nominator should stop ragpicking. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Fails WP:NOR, but we don’t delete most drafts per WP:NDRAFT; bringing them to MfD defeats the purpose of draftspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:51, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - These wholesale draft MFDs are getting out of hand.--WaltCip-(talk) 12:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete this didn’t need to happen in the first place but since it’s extremely obvious this is not intended to be a useful contribution to the encyclopedia but rather a weird essay/soapbox that wouldn’t even be useful to its intended audience then why not just delete it while it’s here? Dronebogus (talk) 13:37, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What Speedy delete criterion? To call “speedy delete” after “keep” !votes displays nonconcurrence with the spirit of WP:CSD. SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:37, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can probably be covered under the spirit of WP:A11, WP:U5 using WP:IAR and WP:NOTBURO. This is not an attempt at making an encyclopedia article, anyone can blatantly see that, and there is no way it’s going to be salvaged. Dronebogus (talk) 16:51, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure IAR does not apply to CSD for very good reason; the last person who tried using the CSD like that ended up desysopped by ArbCom. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:46, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.