Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Shivani Khetan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 14:43, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shivani Khetan

i reviewed the article once again and checked all the references. All the references has her interview. The content and the references are different. Please understand that only people included on the Wikipedia are those who has achieved something notable. I tried to find some more sources to find about the subject but couldn't find it. Subject is a doctor and a tarot card reader. She started a start up, which isn't notable even. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 14:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Neutral~~ pending the assessment of the non-English sources by a native speaker, leaning delete because all of the English-language sources are unacceptable. Most are interviews, but there're also online storefronts and passing mentions, nothing that's in-depth coverage of her. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 02:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to Delete. McClenon has a point; an article resubmitted after a reject with no attempt to fix the issues is grounds for an MfD. (In fairness, the nom buried that lede.) —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Jéské Couriano} 14:42, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:
- - I respectfully disagree with the previous editor as to whether the sources make any difference. They would if this were AFD.
  - The reason to delete is that this was already rejected once, and then resubmitted after rejection, and without any attempt to discuss. Rejection should have some meaning that is stronger than decline. The originator should have done something other than just resubmit. Deleting the draft is less severe than a topic-ban or partial block, and besides, this is a content forum.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per resubmission after rejection without improvement. — csc^-1 01:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Resubmitted without justification following rejection. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete still reads like a resume despite resubmit after rejection. Awards are not from notable groups. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.