Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Madeleina Kay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Madeleina Kay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This should be deleted per the very clear result 6 months ago at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeleina Kay unless some Admin can tell us the current shows significant improvement for activity in the last 6 months. Legacypac (talk) 03:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• She is now young European of the year. She did not have this 6 months ago [1]

This makes her her noteworthy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgrosvenor (talk • contribs) 06:53, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I don't like WP:COI editing, but the COI submitter has provided a new form of notability, which is good enough to avoid G4, and to let a neutral editor submit it to mainspace, and then we can have a second AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The AfD deletion was basically for lack of notability. That can always change, and it is normally perfectly acceptable to create a new draft to attempt to better demonstrate notability. Such a draft is not subject to deletion simply because of the prior AfD -- if it were there would be no realistic avenue to handle people (or other topics) deleted for WP:TOOSOON who later become notable. Moreover, in this particular case there seems some evidence that the situation has in fact changed. Whether it is enough for an article in mainspace I can't say, and that is not relevant here. That should be considers at any AfC review, and/or at an AfD after the draft is moved to mainspace, if it is. No policy-based reason for deletion has been mentioned. Invalid nomination. Trout the nominator. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:11, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.