Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of Good Game reviews

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: move to the reference library. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Good Game reviews

Never going to make it to the mainspace, as this both isn't a notable topic and is pure fancruft. Definite WP:NOTWEBHOST material. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Reference library. It's pretty useful to search for additional sources as Good Game is a reliable one. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Reference library/List of Good Game reviews and link from Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Reference library, per Hellknowz. It has back room uses, but is not for mainspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No objection to moving to project space if it has a use in creating articles. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking around but I'm not seeing a List of Good Game episodes. That would seem more valuable to me while preserving some of the content in mainspace (namely, the game reviewed on a particular episode--the rest is cruft IMO regardless of namespace that anyone who is interested in adding to articles is going to need to have access to the entire episode anyway for the actual content of the review). My first inclination is rework to "episode"-focus and my second-barring-the-first is simply to delete. --Izno (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The show is cancelled and it was never in a verifiable state for our needs (being television). I'd say move it to the Ref lib just to preserve the information (but is it even sourced/accurate?) but I'd also just as soon delete it for that lingering question. There is no need for such detail or even an episode listing at all in mainspace. The source coverage doesn't warrant it. czar 17:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.