Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kundan Srivastava

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kundan Srivastava

At 9 declines currently, and nothing much coming up in searches for the subject, the subject is not notable at this time. Most references are not reliable, and the article seems to be in violation of WP:NPOV. TheMesquito^buzz 18:49, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unlikely to become notable, so TOOSOON. Couldn't find reliable sources that establish notability. APerson (talk!) 18:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am a person working hard for this Article about Kundan Srivastava. Please, I would like to request don't delete my hard working Article and I am trying my best to put much sources then i will submit it for review. Thanks ! Bihngo (talk) 18:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; author either refuses to acknowledge or simply does not comprehend what "no" means when asking if a source is acceptable, continually re-adding unreliable sources and resubmitting, taking up IRC helper time (and a good chunk of my talk page) demanding that we accept the sources as valid. Primefac (talk) 09:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete G11 Advertising masquerading as an article created by a single-purpose account [1] --Surturz (talk) 06:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have checked for books, magazine articles or news reports about this person and can only find material written by the subject himself, by his organizations, by sites selling his book, or on social media. I suggest that Bihngo save a copy of the source text in an offline file, to prevent loss of his/her work, and wait until Mr. Srivastava has had major coverage in several newspapers before submitting again.—Anne Delong (talk) 12:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.