Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Health in Norway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Consensus is to keep the article at the very least. Whether it's suitable to be moved right now is another matter but consensus seems to support creation of the article and thus at the minimum it should be kept. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Health in Norway

This is a copy and paste of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway#Health and is thus a WP:POVFORK. No consensus exists to create this at this stage Fiddle Faddle 17:06, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move to mainspace We do not need prior consensus to create or split an article. The material is substantial enough for an article, and articles of this type are customary for major countries. I propose to resolve the situation by accepting the draft as it stands, and using WP:Summary style to put a summary in the main article to replace the text there, making attributions in the customary manner. This is the normal way in which articles grow. Timtrent, have you any reason why this would not be suitable as a separate article? (the existing article Healthcare in Norway is a very much briefer article, that probably then should be merged). DGG ( talk ) 20:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The thing against it is lack of consensus. I have no opinion either way on the text. I believe some sort of history needs to go with any split out article. Fiddle Faddle 20:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The current health section in the Norway was added relatively recently (September). I remember I thought at the time that is was massive undue in that article and should be split out. Then I forgot about it and nobody else has reacted, but I doubt there will be any opposition to shortening the health section in the Norway article substantially and have a spin-off article instead. The user who inserted the section in the Norway article first started working with a draft, so it's probably the same person (or group of persons) who has submitted the current draft. The question is more whether there is too much of an overlap between this "health in Norway" draft and the "healthcare in Norway" article, but the content in the draft and the current article is pretty different. Iselilja (talk) 21:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move to mainspace. Make the Norway#Health section an executive summary and link to Health in Norway as the main article. Very common to have "Health in <country>" articles. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.