Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ethan Carberry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ethan Carberry

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude (talk) 00:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would CSD A7 it but it isn't an article. Clearly not notable and no claim of importance whatsoever. BLP autobiog by a 13 year old kid. Kb.au (talk) 15:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Userify to User:EthanCarberry and strip the AfC templates. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 00:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. I wouldn't userfy it; this user has no meaningful contributions so far. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 00:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If this were in user space wouldn't it have the markings of a fake article (written in 3rd person)? Maybe non-notable autobiography ought to be a specific qualification for deletion of drafts since it seems to be a recurrent problem. In cases where it is clearly an autobiography, I say delete... No reason to allow it to fester. I'm also not sure how much user page leeway should be given to editors whose only contributions are to their user page or an autobio. This account seems to have been created and used only for this purpose and I think that should be discouraged. Or to sum it up WP:FAKEARTICLE, WP:NOTWEBHOST, and WP:USERBIO. —DIYeditor (talk) 02:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper eveything DIYeditor said which lines up with my views on these. Legacypac (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.