Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Charlie Hargrett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ‑Scottywong| [chatter] || 16:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Charlie Hargrett

Draft:Charlie Hargrett (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ToThAc (talk) 02:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) ‑Scottywong| soliloquize || 02:09, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently kept alive as a personal web page--see the history. DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my personal web page as was suggested. I tried to build an entry about a guitarist that deserves his own page. Talleng2 (talk) 13:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep in draft, which is where this is. Not being edited disruptively or resubmitted tendentiously. Allow editor to work. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Blackfoot (band) as per User:Legacypac's 17:23, 9 March 2018‎. Protect this redirect. The sources do not justify a WP:SPINOUT of the former guitarist from this band. He does not independently pass WP:BIO. Should anyone seek to do a spinout of members from the band, they should seek a consensus for this at Talk:Blackfoot (band). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:03, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Since its subject isn't notable enough for an article, there is no point keeping this draft, which has the same sources as it did when it was declined as an article nearly two years ago. Newshunter12 (talk) 17:15, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Do not delete as there is no valid reason to delete. Keeping it exempt from G13 is a design feature of G13. G13 is for *abandoned* drafts; if someone is keeping it alive then it is not abandoned. However, advise the author of WP:DUD and their right to put it in their userspace.

If in userspace, it is not eligible for WP:CSD#U5 because it is an article draft.

However, advise the author to get mainspace editing experience before attempting to make new pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.