Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ByHours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ByHours (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude (talk) 00:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Submission has been declined 4 times at AfC and has previously been speedy deleted as G5 SeraphWiki (talk) 07:36, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Worth noting that CU found no connection between the creator of this draft and the banned editor who created the now-deleted mainspace article. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ManishMuradiya. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 09:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep Ignoring that this has a dailymail citation, I don't see the harm in letting the draft have more time to be developed further. It seems like some of the sources are borderline reliable-secondary and the mentions are also arguably more than brief. It's possible more could be developed about this. —DIYeditor (talk) 01:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.