Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brown Jovi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. The draft was nominated over a lack of notability, but participants are at an impasse between deleting as hopeless or waiting for its G13 timer to expire. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brown Jovi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

This is a throw a way character to make a joke (Brown Jovi / Bon Jovi) that appears in about 10 seconds of a Ms. Marvel episode, and is in no way notable for an article, let alone a draft, about them. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow delete never going to become an article, totally stupid. Dronebogus (talk) 15:44, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete – Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity, but since it's been nominated from deletion we might as well get rid of it. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sure, but this clearly isn't going to become a mainspace article. Why let it languish between being as it currently is for six months, or other editors coming across it and trying to submit it. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:26, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • There are many, many drafts like this one, some even more nonsensical than this (example 1, example 2). That's where G13 comes in, so editors don't need to send them to MfD every time. There's no harm in keeping these drafts since they're never going to become articles anyway, and even if editors try to submit them to AfC they will 99% be rejected. Just let them be automatically G13'd after six months. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

      It’s here, we should just snow delete it, WP:NOTBURO Dronebogus (talk) 00:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - Stupidity is not a reason to delete a draft. Stop ragpicking. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:50, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Throwaway or not, it has sources only a week old. This is the purpose of draftspace. Don’t bring worthless harmless things to MfD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:24, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Keep - Stay out of draft space, let G13 do its job.--WaltCip-(talk) 12:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.