Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Abdul Salim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus . No consensus to delete. No prejudice against any editors choosing to return this, or other cricketer articles draftified in the same run, back to main. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Abdul Salim

Draft:Abdul Salim (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947^{( c ) (m)} 03:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) J947^{(c) (m)} 03:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible to verify. No information in given source. Probably a naming error in the original scorecard. Jack | ^{talk page} 05:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep--Look at this source.Played for Central India.If this was an AfD, I would argue for a delete ! Vote, but I know precisely well that these AfDs culminate in a Keep almost always, courtesy SNG taking precedence over GNG.So, IMHO, it's unfair to ! Vote Delete in this MfD.Winged Blades ^Godric 13:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable on the evidence, and no reason to suppose sufficient evidence to demonstrate otherwise could be unearthed. Perhaps it satisfies someone's urge to list every cricket player ever, but is that a reason to keep? --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.