Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-08-03 AMC Matador

Wikipedia Mediation Cabal
Status	closed
Request date	Unknown
Mediator(s)	Cowman109 (talk · contribs)
Comment	On hold as the main disputant was blocked for a week.

[[Category:Wikipedia Medcab closed cases|]][[Category:Wikipedia medcab maintenance|]]

Request Information

Request made by: SteveBaker 01:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:SteveBaker

Where is the issue taking place?

...

AMC Matador - today - but over a variety of other automotive articles. Let's stick with AMC Matador for this mediation.

Who's involved?

...

User:SteveBaker and User:Wiarthurhu - this time around at least. Wiathurhu sometimes changes his signature to read matador300 so look for both names on signatures.

What's going on?

...

User:Wiarthurhu has repeatedly added a photograph of a toy car he claims to have built himself (a pinewood derby racer - his claim to have made it himself is on the image page description) into AMC Matador. I (and others) patiently explain that we don't normally remark on toy cars in articles about real cars because just about every real car has toys made of it - and it's just not notable. In this case, it's worse. The photo is in violation of WP:NOR - and it's WP:Vanity. I and several others have reverted this section of the article on several previous occasions - we've discussed it extensively on the talk page - and MANY other people have complaints about this user that are evident on (for example) Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles. Today the problematic text and photo reappeared - I reverted it - adding a clear explanation of why in the edit log - and in the talk page. He re-reverted - calling me a vandal (which he knows I'm not from many other discussions and my extensive contributions - including a recent FA.)...so I re-re-reverted - and now he's put it all back again - a WP:3RR violation. Well, I'm at my wit's end.

Postscript: 12 hours after initially posting this request, I have just been made aware of this: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wiarthurhu - I was completely unaware of this other effort to sanction User:Wiarthurhu for the trouble he's caused in other areas of Wikipedia. The problem obviously goes far beyond AMC Matador - but I would still prefer to have this specific problem mediated so we can fix up this article and move on. SteveBaker 11:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What would you like to change about that?

...

I would like User:Wiarthurhu to take a Wikibreak to cool off - and to have someone other than the present protagonists take him quietly to one side and explain why this is wrong.

Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?

...

No need to work discreetly. I have nothing to hide.

Mediator response

I respectfully recuse myself as I have been involved with Wiarthurhu/Matador300 in the past and have no further action to contribute to any form of mediation involving him. Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wiarthurhu and Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-05 F-14 Tomcat for further details. CQJ 18:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking this case and the others concerning Wiarthurhu off the new cases list as this doesn't particularlly seem to involve content needing mediation, but is a user conduct dispute. WP:RFAR may be a possibility, but it may be best to hold off on that for a bit while some more attempts are made. For now, I'm stalling a bit, but I will speak with Wiarthurhu since this is a clearly growing issue. Cowman109^Talk 06:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiarthurhu was indefinite blocked, so I guess this case is closed. Cowman109^Talk 06:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise offers

Discussion