Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Least astonishment" on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Writing better articles (redirect from Principle of least astonishment)information from an article. Shortcuts WP:PLA WP:LEAST WP:ASTONISH WP:SURPRISE When the principle of least astonishment is successfully employed, information is...58 KB (8,310 words) - 20:37, 30 July 2024
- it has a realistic educational use and applying the principle of least astonishment in categorization and placement." The resolution emphasizes that controversial...3 KB (352 words) - 12:32, 19 May 2018
- Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Muhammad images/Question 6 (section Question 6: Principle of least astonishment)access to information for all," but also "We support the principle of least astonishment: content on Wikimedia projects should be presented to readers in such...42 KB (6,214 words) - 04:38, 3 March 2023
- of "least astonishment" most likely to be? It think "least astonishment" is an unclear concept, but I take it to be entirely different to "least offence"...99 KB (13,941 words) - 22:22, 4 February 2023
- respond to a result turning up Quercus. Also, under the principle of least astonishment, we want people to be in a position of understanding information without...2 KB (340 words) - 03:26, 25 February 2021
- to new users, making it even more in violation of the principle of least astonishment. Danger (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is...2 KB (222 words) - 05:40, 12 February 2022
- per nom and then redirect to Slave narrative per the Principle of least astonishment. The "slave journal" described on the existing page has to do with...3 KB (276 words) - 11:09, 13 February 2022
- Foundation, controversial images should follow the principle of 'least astonishment', that is, we should choose images that respect the conventional expectations...7 KB (833 words) - 21:16, 29 March 2021
- principle of least astonishment? � (talk) 13:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC) I see what you mean, but I don't think this will indeed violate principle of least astonishment...19 KB (1,681 words) - 07:13, 3 March 2023
- Principle of Some Astonishment: Remind you of any Wikipedia articles? ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 30 August 2018 Essay Contribute — Share this...1 KB (9,704 words) - 02:37, 6 January 2024
- article about a wonderful person. But its violation of the principle of least astonishment gives me a queasy feeling. Delete. - Plutor 19:04, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)...2 KB (320 words) - 13:25, 1 September 2023
- controversial content, which states, We support the principle of least astonishment: content on Wikimedia projects should be presented to readers in such...8 KB (1,075 words) - 03:08, 8 June 2024
- to a general audience In accordance with Wikipedia's principle of least astonishment, make sure readers know what to expect when they click on a link....4 KB (437 words) - 02:58, 9 September 2022
- than it would people looking for this album. Under the Principle of Least Astonishment, I think the best course of action is to delete. -- ShinmaWa(talk)...9 KB (976 words) - 10:37, 25 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Pay attention to spelling (merged in) Wikipedia:Principle of least astonishment (merged in) Wikipedia:Pronoun (merged in) Wikipedia:Substub (shouldn't...2 KB (325 words) - 18:41, 12 December 2005
- in [[coprophagia]]"? This not only would follow the principle of "least astonishment", but be more informative. -- llywrch 20:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC)...4 KB (380 words) - 00:01, 6 January 2024
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images/Proposed decision (section Principle of Least Astonishment)"Principle of least astonishment" holds that the content of Wikipedia should only be made to 'astonish' the editor when such an astonishment is necessary...131 KB (14,386 words) - 20:38, 28 January 2023
- --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC) Delete per the principle of least astonishment. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC) Delete. Decolonization...4 KB (339 words) - 04:35, 15 February 2022
- an article about a specific school in Pakistan? The principle of least astonishment says English Grammar School should be a redirect pointing to Grammar...4 KB (376 words) - 16:03, 25 October 2019
- history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ] Per the principle of least astonishment. The iPhone article doesn't talk about the supposed next generation...6 KB (480 words) - 12:20, 10 February 2023
- fixing a redirect anyway. Both redirects violate the principle of least astonishment, but I don't feel comfortable unilaterally invoking this for a VfD
- editor's intention is, and that's a violation of the Principle of least astonishment (←Type-A link). Say the example above is linked to "blood libel".