Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:IJUSTLIKEIT" on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:I just don't like it (redirect from IJUSTLIKEIT)I just don't like it, its inverse, I just like it, and their variants, are not arguments to use in talk page discussions. In their book, Business Negotiation...15 KB (2,146 words) - 22:07, 16 May 2024
- Gprscrippers (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC) Really? Sounds like WP:IJUSTLIKEIT. GNG requires more than that. Dom from Paris (talk) 20:08, 22 August...6 KB (650 words) - 16:20, 6 September 2018
- based upon any wikipedia policy, and appears to be an emotion based "IJUSTLIKEIT" vote. Sandman888 (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC) This AfD is clearly...10 KB (1,196 words) - 15:44, 7 February 2023
- trival mention doesn’t pass WP:GNG. Your argument more seemed like WP:IJUSTLIKEIT. — Harshil want to talk? 04:26, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Sorry, let me...11 KB (986 words) - 10:12, 15 September 2019
- arguments to KEEP? Violates WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:Listcruft and/or WP:IJUSTLIKEIT. But somehow (wink) when it comes to the above Holy Grail of TV Guest...30 KB (4,365 words) - 14:57, 2 February 2022
- I am disappointed with the quality of the arguments for "keep" (WP:IJUSTLIKEIT) and none of them address my main points. (1) This is a WP:REDUNDANTFORK...22 KB (3,150 words) - 17:39, 2 February 2022
- throw around acronyms to justify what seems to be just a spurious WP:IJUSTLIKEIT argument. Volunteer Marek 14:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC) Sources in the article...36 KB (4,414 words) - 14:14, 24 April 2021
- to a user who showed up to support Icewhiz in an edit war and make WP:IJUSTLIKEIT votes in support of Icewhiz, without prior engagement on talk. #3 uhh...193 KB (0 words) - 18:32, 20 March 2023
- arguments to KEEP? Violates WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:Listcruft and/or WP:IJUSTLIKEIT. But somehow (wink) when it comes to the above Holy Grail of TV Guest...8 KB (42,613 words) - 15:25, 3 March 2023
- you feel that the behavior of other editors here and the fact that WP:IJUSTLIKEIT justifies violating the major policy against WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. No...78 KB (11,194 words) - 06:02, 21 August 2023
- throw around acronyms to justify what seems to be just a spurious WP:IJUSTLIKEIT argument. Volunteer Marek 14:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC) Sources in the article...8 KB (45,623 words) - 11:26, 24 April 2021
- I am disappointed with the quality of the arguments for "keep" (WP:IJUSTLIKEIT) and none of them address my main points. (1) This is a WP:REDUNDANTFORK...13 KB (56,170 words) - 17:50, 12 July 2024
- trival mention doesn’t pass WP:GNG. Your argument more seemed like WP:IJUSTLIKEIT. — Harshil want to talk? 04:26, 5 September 2019 (UTC) Sorry, let me...4 KB (28,167 words) - 11:45, 3 March 2023
- you feel that the behavior of other editors here and the fact that WP:IJUSTLIKEIT justifies violating the major policy against WP:DISRUPTIVE editing. No...7 KB (50,761 words) - 14:40, 8 December 2022
- based upon any wikipedia policy, and appears to be an emotion based "IJUSTLIKEIT" vote. Sandman888 (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC) This AfD is clearly...6 KB (57,011 words) - 15:29, 3 March 2023
- Gprscrippers (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC) Really? Sounds like WP:IJUSTLIKEIT. GNG requires more than that. Dom from Paris (talk) 20:08, 22 August...5 KB (42,013 words) - 12:25, 3 March 2023
- from that battleground area, repeating the same policy-violating WP:IJUSTLIKEIT arguments that have got us nowhere. If all of us managed to shut the...250 KB (36,752 words) - 14:29, 15 April 2023
- (talk) 12:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC) You can't just declare it "DUE" per IJUSTLIKEIT, when it's clearly an issue of improper WP:SYNTHesis and source misrepresentation...248 KB (33,238 words) - 16:41, 28 January 2023
- rather than backed up by anything. People are basically making the WP:IJUSTLIKEIT argument. In reality, Fox News is in a completely different category...253 KB (36,350 words) - 15:14, 20 May 2022
- Cawley shows that he values presenting things that interest him (WP:IJUSTLIKEIT) over being a reliable source (WP:RS). Some of his sources are also unverifiable...75 KB (9,141 words) - 02:22, 29 December 2023