Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Awesome Kong/1

Awesome Kong

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. 48JCL TALK 21:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This 2010 promotion has 13 citation needed tags, as well as other untagged statements lacking citations. Spinixster (trout me!) 07:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As reviewer would agree with a delisting as is, needs a lot of work especially on the post-2011 material. Wizardman 21:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is just too much uncited here to retain as a GA. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.