Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 2

July 2

File:The Story of Ivy (UK cover).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I history-split this from File:The Story of Ivy.jpg before realizing it was likely published in 1933 in the UK (not 1927 as it first seemed). Delete, then undelete in 2029 when the US copyright expires. Wikiacc (¶) 00:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tamiya XStock BMAX1.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted object: see c:COM:TOYS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Microsoft DENSO1.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted object: see c:COM:TOYS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baron Viento1.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of copyrighted object: see c:COM:TOYS. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KumbakonamCollege.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused (personal?) image, no obvious encyclopedic use Jonteemil (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GovernmentArtsCollege Kumbakonam.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unused (personal?) image, no obvious encyclopedic use Jonteemil (talk) 10:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Toa Payoh murder cat cage.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file is an image showing the cat cage used to confine the victim of 2016 Toa Payoh child abuse case. While this forms one of the most heinous acts in the case, the file only shows a cat cage, and the rest of understanding rests on the caption.

(If the file showed how the victim barely fitted into the cage – maybe a CG demo – then in my opinion this relays more information that provides more contextual significance.)

To show how cramped was the victim's resting place, I believe it could have been replaced by a picture showing a similarly-sized cage from c:Category:Cat cages together with a modified description (e.g. "A cat cage. The victim was confined in a similar-sized cage until his death.").

The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#1, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Penguin Times.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides being "an image of a newspaper article or other publication that contains long legible sections of copyrighted text" (WP:NFC#UUI), there's nothing in the article that addresses the friendly relationship between players and developers in detail, so even a textual quote within the article would be unnecessary. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 13:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Venus-of-Schelklingen.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also File talk:Venus-of-Schelklingen.jpg. Can a photo of a 40,000 year old relic really be copyrightable? Jonteemil (talk) 14:56, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's the photo that is copyrighted, surely, not the sculpture? Scientific photography like this takes considerable skill, enough to qualify as original. – Joe (talk) 16:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Jonteemil (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as is, per Joe Roe. There'd still be a copyright on this photo, and it sounds like a free replacement can't be made unless/until the sculpture is publicly exhibited. hinnk (talk) 20:13, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Santino Fontana.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has stated here that they don't actually own the copyright to this photo, as they originally claimed at upload. MrOllie (talk) 16:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4chan logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Currently tagged for F5 but I'm not sure it applies, since Commons has both c:File:4chan logo.svg and c:File:4chan Logo.png claiming that they don't meet the threshold of originality. The file doesn't qualify for F8 either, since the png is a different logo and the svg is a different file format, so I thought I'd bring it here. Nickps (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the F5 tag. Please let me know if I wasn't supposed to. Nickps (talk) 22:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.