Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 January 20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 00:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MargaritavilleGC.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PETEYTHEREF (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the U.S. This sculpture was likely created no earlier than 1985 (the year the franchise was established) and thus too new to be in public domain. Unlikely to be eligible for fair use as the parent article already has tons of images. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Likely non-free. No prejudice to restoration if someone can create a valid fair use claim for the file -FASTILY 10:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Formerhermitage.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Brad94 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

After enquiring with Pickering and Ajax public libraries, it has transpired that this photograph was first published in 1982 and probably taken for the 1982 Heritage Ajax article where it was found. This means it is clearly non-free in both the US and Canada. Since the building depicted has been destroyed in 1982, a new replacement can no longer be found. However, I would like to check with those more well-versed in non-free image rules whether this image meets the guidelines given that there are already a number of images included in the Pickering College article and there may well be an older PD image of this building. Felix QW (talk) 09:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 00:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Multicolor ball clock.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fontanadiluce (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Doubtful own work, belongs to George Nelson. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 05:48, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:BB13-US-Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DJCA (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

May be allowed by MOS:TVIMAGE, but the title card lacks "13" since Big Brother logo(s) dropped the number part after the tenth season. Even with different background, I fail to see how the intertitle is contextually significant to Big Brother 13 (American season). George Ho (talk) 20:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bb11-usa-logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alucard 16 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

May be allowed by MOS:TVIMAGE, but the title card/logo uses a door instead of "11", even with different background. Potentially fails WP:NFCC#8 for usage in Big Brother 11 (American season) George Ho (talk) 20:24, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rumpus.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Oanabay04 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image is not the subject of any significant sourced commentary in either the Joe Palma article or the Harriette Tarler article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Whpq. I can't realy see any way to justify the non-free use of this photo in Harriette Tarler since the reader doesn't really need to see this screenshot to understand that Tarler appeared in a number of Three Stooges shorts. The non-free use in Joe Palma also has the same problem; however, if more sourced critical commentary could be found about Palma being a "Fake Shemp" and the file was added to Fake Shemp, then perhaps a non-free image of Palma as "Fake Shemp" might be able to be justified. Given the date this photo is supposed to have been taken, there's a good chance that there might be a publicity photo of Palma as "Fake Shemp" floating around somewhere on the Internet (e.g. Ebay) which may possibly now be within the public domain per {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}. If such a photo could be found, it could be replace the non-free one currently used in the main infobox of the Palma article and also show him as "Fake Shemp". -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:50, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.