Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 February 20

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Rogerd (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Energinet logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benstown (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Redundant to commons file, c:File:Energinet logo.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:42, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 13:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:HostBar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Drcwright (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:HostBar.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 13:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley meets with Rodolfo Escalera.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Brody2786 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I can't see any evidence that the photo was released to the public domain. Has incomplete source information, metadata generated long after the probable date taken, and the uploader has previously had files deleted due to other violations. reppop^talk 04:35, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except Cricket Ireland. -FASTILY 01:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricket Ireland logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Malpass93 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image is used on multiple articles, I believe incorrectly. It is the logo of Cricket Ireland, and so that is a valid fair use, and compliant with WP:NFCC. However, it's also being used on Ireland women's cricket team and Ireland under-19 cricket team, neither of which are correct uses, as it's the logo of the organisation, not the team. The fair use templates for everything other than Cricket Ireland should be removed, and it should be removed from the other pages, and swapped out for File:Cricket Ireland flag.svg, the flag used by the Ireland cricket teams (and used in the infobox of the Ireland cricket team article). This is also consistent with multiple discussions for other country's teams/organising committee's logos here. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree with Joseph2302: ww2censor (talk) 10:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed this is a well-thought-out course of action. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 22:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Missing evidence of permission. No prejudice to restoration if permission is received via VRT -FASTILY 01:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LeDroitParkMural.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rcc105 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The uploader is the photographer sharing their own work under a free license, but there is no evidence that the mural they are photographing is itself freely licensed. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 20:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: US freedom of panorama does not apply to artwork. HouseBlaster^talk 04:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: It's a good photo and used in two articles. Would it be practical to ask the artist for permission? The Quirky Kitty (talk) 22:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @The Quirky Kitty: If you can figure out who to ask, absolutely! When I very briefly looked into it, it seemed like possibly a group work? {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 03:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I sent a quick email to the DC Commission on Arts & Humanities, asking who holds the copyright or whether we could get permission to use this photo. If they agree, I'd refer to VRT. It's worth a shot at least. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 15:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Saturday Press.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Postdlf (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low-quality, cropped version of File:A Direct Challenge to Police Chief Brunskill.jpg. Orphaned and a .gif. I support deletion as obsolete. HouseBlaster^talk 23:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 02:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, has no use anymore. The Quirky Kitty (talk) 22:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.